Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
200 Jarvis St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.65687, -79.37471
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 28 January 2015Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 15 109611 STE 27 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 March 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 144529 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 109611 STE 27 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 28 January 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 144529 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 14 March 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
155 Dundas St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 144529 STE 27 OZ · submitted 14 March 2011 · Closed · from registration SM15948 (Great Gulf Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15948: Zoning application for a 44-storey condominium building at 155 Dundas Street East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 144529 STE 27 OZ at 155 Dundas St E: A rezoning application for the construction of a new mixed use building with retail at grade. It will have 384 residential units with 5 levels of below grade parking. The building is proposed to be a 43storey building including a 10 storey podium. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning application for a 44-storey condominium building at 155 Dundas Street East
Matched fields
- address
- 155 DUNDAS ST E
- application_address
- 155 DUNDAS ST E
155 Dundas St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 144529 STE 27 OZ · submitted 14 March 2011 · Closed · from registration SM15949 (Great Gulf Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15949: Zoning application for a 44 storey condomonium building at 155 Dundas StreetEat (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 144529 STE 27 OZ at 155 Dundas St E: A rezoning application for the construction of a new mixed use building with retail at grade. It will have 384 residential units with 5 levels of below grade parking. The building is proposed to be a 43storey building including a 10 storey podium. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning application for a 44 storey condomonium building at 155 Dundas StreetEat
Matched fields
- address
- 155 DUNDAS ST
- application_address
- 155 DUNDAS ST E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13
4 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
83 lobbied · 97 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 83 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 11% | 0.14 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 97 | 1,793 | 93% (n=14) | 7% | 17% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.