lobbyTO

Address · Ward 18 · Lily Cheng

2 Sheppard Ave E

Registrations naming this address
3
1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations
62
15 offices contacted
Applications at this address
2
4 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
Location
43.76201, -79.41045
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

3

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Ward 23 Willowdale21
  • Councillor Filion18
  • Development Review4
  • Ward 26 Don Valley West4
  • Development and Growth Services2
  • Office of the Deputy City Manager, Development and2
  • Councillor Burnside2
  • Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence2
Data table· 15 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 23 WillowdaleMember of council211529 November 2017
Councillor FilionCouncillor staff18929 November 2017
Development ReviewCity staff4015 January 2025
Ward 26 Don Valley WestMember of council4412 February 2015
Development and Growth ServicesCity staff204 September 2026
Office of the Deputy City Manager, Development andCity staff204 September 2026
Councillor BurnsideCouncillor staff2212 January 2015
Ward 15 Eglinton-LawrenceMember of council2212 February 2015
Office of the Chief Financial Officer and TreasureCity staff102 September 2026
John FilionCouncillor staff1014 September 2021
MayorMember of council1013 February 2015
Ward 18 WillowdaleMember of council118 September 2019
Ward 33 Don Valley EastMember of council116 February 2015
Ward 34 Don Valley EastMember of council116 February 2015
Ward 8 York WestMember of council1117 February 2015
All registrations· 3 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM37909RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust2 Sheppard Avenue EastBuilding Permits; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law2 September 2026 – 2 September 20275
SM26018RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust2 Sheppard Avenue EastBuilding Permits; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law7 April 2018 – 7 April 20274
SM19042RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust2 Sheppard Avenue EastPlanning and Development, Rental Housing Demolition or Conversion; Planning and Development Applica…12 March 2013 – 31 December 202453

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

2
Data table· 2 rows
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
14 172101 NNY 23 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)11 June 2014Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
13 171700 NNY 23 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)21 May 2013Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18

18 lobbied · 125 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18: 18 lobbied and 125 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied18Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied125Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18

37 lobbied · 63 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=8
  • Matched, unlobbied64% n=5

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied36%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied24%
  • Matched, unlobbied16%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18: 37 lobbied and 63 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied37—100% (n=8)0%24%0.00
Matched, unlobbied63—64% (n=5)36%16%0.04
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.