lobbyTO

Address · Ward 4 · Gord Perks

2 Melbourne Ave

Registrations naming this address
6
2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations
80
24 offices contacted
Applications at this address
1
3 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 4 · Gord Perks
Location
43.64066, -79.42817
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

6

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Data table· 24 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Office of Councillor Perks, Ward 4Councillor staff2703 June 2022
Ward 4 Parkdale-High ParkMember of council8523 August 2022
Alejandra BravoCouncillor staff6022 March 2023
Chris MoiseCouncillor staff406 October 2023
Dianne SaxeMember of council4328 March 2023
Alejandra BravoMember of council3016 March 2023
Dianne SaxeCouncillor staff3328 March 2023
Gord PerksCouncillor staff3019 May 2026
Stephen HolydayCouncillor staff3021 December 2022
Office of Councillor Ana Bailao (Ward 9)Councillor staff2019 October 2022
Ward 10 Spadina-Fort YorkMember of council2218 January 2019
Brad BradfordMember of council209 January 2023
Gord PerksMember of council2019 May 2026
Development ReviewCity staff104 March 2025
Development Review DivisionCity staff105 March 2025
Engineering and Construction ServicesCity staff1020 July 2023
Ward 9 DavenportMember of council1131 October 2022
Chris MoiseMember of council1018 January 2023
Lily ChengCouncillor staff1021 February 2023
Lily ChengMember of council1021 February 2023
Mike ColleCouncillor staff105 October 2023
Paula FletcherCouncillor staff1010 February 2023
Paula FletcherMember of council1018 January 2023
Stephen HolydayMember of council109 December 2022
All registrations· 6 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM36401Hullmark Asset Management2 Melbourne AvenuePlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan27 February 2025 – 18 September 20261
SM33689Hullmark Asset Management2 Melbourne AvenuePlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan21 September 2022 – 1 September 20272
SM33695Hullmark Asset Management2 Melbourne AvenuePlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan21 September 2022 – 8 April 202430
SM33706Hullmark Asset Management2 Melbourne AvenuePlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan21 September 2022 – 6 December 20231
SM32045Hullmark Developments Limited2 Melbourne AvenueEconomic Development; Planning and Development, Heritage; Planning and Development Application15 July 2021 – 31 March 20277
SM26635Hullmark Developments Limited2 Melbourne AvenuePlanning and Development Application, Minor Variance; Planning and Development, Combined Application4 September 2018 – 31 March 202739

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

1
Data table· 1 row
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
19 244664 STE 04 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)4 November 2019Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4

12 lobbied · 20 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4: 12 lobbied and 20 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied12Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied20Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.