Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise

2 Dundonald St

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 0
Communications on those registrations: 0
Applications at this address: 1; 2 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Location: 43.66601, -79.38480
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

None.

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

No communications recorded.

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 6 November 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 248458 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 1 row

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
15 248458 STE 27 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	6 November 2015	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

593 Yonge St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
15 248458 STE 27 SA · submitted 6 November 2015 · Closed · from registration SM22802 (Cresford Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22802: 587 to 599 Yonge Street, 2 to 4 Dundonald Street, 7 to 9 Gloucester Street, City of Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 248458 STE 27 SA at 593 Yonge St: A Site Plan Control application to develop a 44-storey building, containing 528 residential units and 3,242 square metres of retail/commercial space. Zoning By-law Amendment File No. 12 235622 STE 27 OZ. In April 2013, the owner filed an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board (PL130332). Zoning By-l… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 587 to 599 Yonge Street, 2 to 4 Dundonald Street, 7 to 9 Gloucester Street, City of Toronto
Matched fields
address
599 YONGE ST
application_address
599 YONGE ST
593 Yonge St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
15 248458 STE 27 SA · submitted 6 November 2015 · Closed · from registration SM22918 (Cresford Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22918: 587 to 599 Yonge Street, 2 to 4 Dundonald Street, 7 to 9 Gloucester Street, City of Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 248458 STE 27 SA at 593 Yonge St: A Site Plan Control application to develop a 44-storey building, containing 528 residential units and 3,242 square metres of retail/commercial space. Zoning By-law Amendment File No. 12 235622 STE 27 OZ. In April 2013, the owner filed an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board (PL130332). Zoning By-l… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 587 to 599 Yonge Street, 2 to 4 Dundonald Street, 7 to 9 Gloucester Street, City of Toronto
Matched fields
address
599 YONGE ST
application_address
599 YONGE ST

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13

56 lobbied · 128 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied7%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13: 56 lobbied and 128 matched unlobbied applications in 32 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	56	—	100% (n=5)	0%	7%	0.16
Matched, unlobbied	128	—	100% (n=7)	0%	2%	0.01

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.