Address · Ward 6 · James Pasternak
2 Champagne Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Location
- 43.76642, -79.47234
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 8 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 9 Davenport | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 5 July 2021 |
| Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 2 July 2021 |
| Ward 12 Toronto-St. Paul's | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 12 July 2021 |
| Ward 16 Don Valley East | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 12 July 2021 |
| Ward 19 Beaches-East York | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 13 July 2021 |
| Ward 3 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 12 July 2021 |
| Ward 6 York Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 12 July 2021 |
| Ward 8 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 12 July 2021 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM32014 | Champagne Centre | 2 Champagne Drive | Planning and Development Application | 8 July 2021 – 31 December 2021 | 6 |
| SM31886 | Champagne Centre | 2 Champagne Drive | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 22 June 2021 – 19 July 2021 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 27 May 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0286/24NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 31 December 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 252336 NNY 06 OZUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 13 January 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0025/21NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 5 January 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0011/18NYClosed · Approved
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0286/24NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 27 May 2024 | Closed Approved |
| 21 252336 NNY 06 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 31 December 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| A0025/21NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 January 2021 | Closed Approved |
| A0011/18NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 5 January 2018 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 6
2 lobbied · 14 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 14 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.