lobbyTO

Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik

1A Atlantic Ave

Registrations naming this address
2
1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations
44
37 offices contacted
Applications at this address
1
No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Location
43.63654, -79.41843
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

2

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Ward 22 St. Paul's4
  • Ward 30 Toronto-Danforth3
  • Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park2
  • Ward 18 Davenport2
  • Office of Adam Vaughan, Councillor1
  • Office of Gord Perks, Councillor1
  • Mayor1
  • Ward 1 Etobicoke North1
Data table· 37 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 22 St. Paul'sMember of council4120 January 2012
Ward 30 Toronto-DanforthMember of council3210 January 2012
Ward 14 Parkdale-High ParkMember of council2110 January 2012
Ward 18 DavenportMember of council2120 January 2012
Office of Adam Vaughan, CouncillorCouncillor staff119 January 2012
Office of Gord Perks, CouncillorCouncillor staff106 January 2012
MayorMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 1 Etobicoke NorthMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 10 York CentreMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 11 York South-WestonMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 12 York South-WestonMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 15 Eglinton-LawrenceMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 16 Eglinton-LawrenceMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 17 DavenportMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 2 Etobicoke NorthMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 20 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council106 January 2012
Ward 25 Don Valley WestMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 26 Don Valley WestMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-RosedaleMember of council119 January 2012
Ward 3 Etobicoke CentreMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 32 Beaches-East YorkMember of council1110 January 2012
Ward 34 Don Valley EastMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 35 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 36 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 37 Scarborough CentreMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 38 Scarborough CentreMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 39 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 4 Etobicoke CentreMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 40 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 42 Scarborough-Rouge RiverMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 43 Scarborough EastMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 44 Scarborough EastMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 5 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 6 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 7 York WestMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 8 York WestMember of council1020 January 2012
Ward 9 York CentreMember of council1020 January 2012
All registrations· 2 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM17712Core Outdoor1A Atlantic AvenueBy-law / Regulation20 January 2012 – 20 January 201230
SM17675Core Outdoor1A Atlantic AvenueSigns6 January 2012 – 10 January 201214

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

1
Data table· 1 row
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
16 106441 STE 14 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)20 January 2016Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=5
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied3%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied66—100% (n=5)0%3%0.05
Matched, unlobbied165—100% (n=11)0%2%0.04
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.