Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
1921 Davenport Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.67017, -79.45554
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Bailao | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 4 February 2020 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM29726 | Jason Silva | 1921 Davenport Rd. | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian… | 4 February 2020 – 14 August 2025 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 22 October 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1333/21TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 18 November 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 219677 STE 09 SAUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1333/21TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 22 October 2021 | Closed Approved |
| 20 219677 STE 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 18 November 2020 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1921 Davenport Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A1333/21TEY · submitted 22 October 2021 · Closed · from registration SM29726 (Jason Silva)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM29726: 1921 Davenport Rd. To discuss the Committee of Adjustments variances and Site Plan Approval. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A1333/21TEY at 1921 Davenport Rd: To construct a new five-storey mixed-use building with 2 commercial units and 19 residential units. The existing one-storey commercial building will be demolished. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1921 Davenport Rd. To discuss the Committee of Adjustments variances and Site Plan Approval.
Matched fields
- address
- 1921 DAVENPORT RD
- application_address
- 1921 DAVENPORT RD
1921 Davenport Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 219677 STE 09 SA · submitted 18 November 2020 · Under Review · from registration SM29726 (Jason Silva)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.95
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM29726: 1921 Davenport Rd. To discuss the Committee of Adjustments variances and Site Plan Approval. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 219677 STE 09 SA at 1921 Davenport Rd: Proposal to construct a 6 storey mixed-use building with 36 residential dwelling units (2,134.47 m² of residential gross floor area) and commercial space on the ground floor (109.14 m² of non-residential gross floor area). Four parking spaces are proposed at the rear of the building with access fro… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1921 Davenport Rd. To discuss the Committee of Adjustments variances and Site Plan Approval.
Matched fields
- address
- 1921 DAVENPORT RD
- application_address
- 1921 DAVENPORT RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9
27 lobbied · 333 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 27 | 169 | 67% (n=27) | 33% | 26% | 29% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 333 | 134 | 95% (n=279) | 5% | 6% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.