Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
19 Western Battery Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.63957, -79.41133
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Layton | Councillor staff | 2 | 1 | 10 October 2017 |
| Internal Corporate Services | City staff | 1 | 0 | 20 June 2018 |
| Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 10 October 2017 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM30631 | CentreCourt | 19 Western Battery Road | Planning and Development | 30 September 2020 – 31 December 2020 | 0 |
| SM25061 | CentreCourt Developments Inc. | 19 Western Battery Road | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 20 September 2017 – 31 December 2017 | 0 |
| SM25027 | CentreCourt | 19 Western Battery Road | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 13 September 2017 – 26 April 2027 | 4 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 29 November 2018Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 18 262466 STE 19 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 2 October 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1066/17TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 3 May 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0503/17TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 14 September 2009Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 09 168632 STE 19 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 262466 STE 19 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 29 November 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A1066/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 2 October 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0503/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 3 May 2017 | Closed Approved |
| 09 168632 STE 19 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 14 September 2009 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
19 Western Battery Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A1066/17TEY · submitted 2 October 2017 · Closed · from registration SM25061 (CentreCourt Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25061: 19 Western Battery Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A1066/17TEY at 19 Western Battery Rd: To alter the redevelopment plan for a new 28-storey residential building containing 481 dwelling units, approved under Site-specific By-laws 566-2000, 684-2003 and 1079-2010 by permitting a day nursery, reducing the minimum required resident parking spaces, increasing the maximum permitted building… (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 19 Western Battery Road
Matched fields
- address
- 19 WESTERN BATTERY RD
- application_address
- 19 WESTERN BATTERY RD
19 Western Battery Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0503/17TEY · submitted 3 May 2017 · Closed · from registration SM25061 (CentreCourt Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25061: 19 Western Battery Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0503/17TEY at 19 Western Battery Rd: To alter the redevelopment plan for a new 28-storey residential building containing 481 dwelling units, approved under Site-Specific By-law 1079-2010 with respect to development standards associated with: mechanical penthouse area, vehicle parking spaces and bicycle parking spaces. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 19 Western Battery Road
Matched fields
- address
- 19 WESTERN BATTERY RD
- application_address
- 19 WESTERN BATTERY RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10
20 lobbied · 261 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 136 | 100% (n=20) | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 261 | 138 | 93% (n=214) | 7% | 5% | 18% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.