19 Glen Agar Dr

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 3; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 7; 3 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 9; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
Location: 43.66158, -79.55094
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Minto Communities Inc.SM23667 · 1 November 20165
Minto Communities Inc.SM27965 · 4 April 20192
Minto Communities Inc.SM20908 · 25 September 20140

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Mayor's Office3
Mayor John Tory2
Ward 3 Etobicoke Centre2

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Mayor's Office	Councillor staff	3	3	5 April 2019
Mayor John Tory	Councillor staff	2	2	15 May 2019
Ward 3 Etobicoke Centre	Member of council	2	2	3 November 2016

All registrations· 3 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM27965	Minto Communities Inc.	19 Glen Agar Drive	Planning and Development, Combined Application	4 April 2019 – 4 April 2027	2
SM23667	Minto Communities Inc.	19 Glen Agar Drive	Planning and Development, Combined Application	1 November 2016 – 31 December 2026	5
SM20908	Minto Communities Inc.	19 Glen Agar Drive	Planning and Development, Combined Application	25 September 2014 – 30 December 2016	0

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 13 March 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0148/19EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 13 March 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0149/19EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 13 March 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0150/19EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 13 March 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0151/19EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 13 March 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0152/19EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 13 March 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0153/19EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 13 March 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4536484Cancelled · Withdrawn
Submitted 19 June 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 177458 WET 03 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 19 June 2015Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 15 177470 WET 03 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 9 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0148/19EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	13 March 2019	Closed Approved
A0149/19EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	13 March 2019	Closed Approved
A0150/19EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	13 March 2019	Closed Approved
A0151/19EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	13 March 2019	Closed Approved
A0152/19EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	13 March 2019	Closed Approved
A0153/19EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	13 March 2019	Closed Approved
COA-4536484 Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	13 March 2019	Cancelled Withdrawn
15 177458 WET 03 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	19 June 2015	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
15 177470 WET 03 SB Development application	Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)	19 June 2015	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 2

7 lobbied · 115 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 2: 7 lobbied and 115 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	7	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	115	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2

9 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2: 9 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	9	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

16 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 2 rows

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide: 16 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	16	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	48	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.