Address · Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
19 Anson Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Location
- 43.72481, -79.24014
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
6- Submitted 23 January 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0015/26SCPostponed · In progress
- Submitted 23 January 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0016/26SCPostponed · In progress
- Submitted 23 January 2026Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0003/26SCPostponed · In progress
- Submitted 17 December 2025Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5757123Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 17 December 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5757127Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 17 December 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5757129Cancelled · Withdrawn
Data table· 6 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0015/26SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 January 2026 | Postponed In progress |
| A0016/26SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 January 2026 | Postponed In progress |
| B0003/26SC Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 23 January 2026 | Postponed In progress |
| COA-5757123 Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 17 December 2025 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| COA-5757127 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 17 December 2025 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| COA-5757129 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 17 December 2025 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 20
9 lobbied · 295 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 295 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.