Address · Ward 19 · Brad Bradford

1884 Queen St E

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 5; 2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 15; 7 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 4; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
Location: 43.66898, -79.30556
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Fieldgate HomesSM25331 · 16 November 20179
Fieldgate HomesSM25336 · 16 November 20175
Fieldgate HomesSM27859 · 12 March 20191
Fieldgate HomesSM24718 · 15 June 20170
Kilmer Brownfield Management LimitedSM18874 · 30 January 20130

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Toronto Transit Commission5
Councillor Bradford3
Mayor John Tory3
Brad Bradford1
Councillor Brad Bradford1
Ward 19 Beaches-East York1
Ward 32 Beaches-East York1

Data table· 7 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Toronto Transit Commission	Local board	5	0	26 January 2018
Councillor Bradford	Councillor staff	3	1	27 April 2020
Mayor John Tory	Councillor staff	3	1	17 October 2018
Brad Bradford	Councillor staff	1	1	12 March 2019
Councillor Brad Bradford	Councillor staff	1	0	27 April 2020
Ward 19 Beaches-East York	Member of council	1	1	2 April 2019
Ward 32 Beaches-East York	Member of council	1	0	28 November 2017

All registrations· 5 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM27859	Fieldgate Homes	1884 Queen Street East	Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan	12 March 2019 – 25 April 2019	1
SM25331	Fieldgate Homes	1884 Queen Street East.	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	16 November 2017 – 15 November 2025	9
SM25336	Fieldgate Homes	1884 Queen Street East.	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	16 November 2017 – 23 March 2018	5
SM24718	Fieldgate Homes	1884 Queen Street East	Planning and Development, Combined Application	15 June 2017 – 31 December 2018	0
SM18874	Kilmer Brownfield Management Limited	1884 Queen Street East.	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	30 January 2013 – 31 December 2015	0

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 9 November 2020Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 20 216458 STE 19 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 19 December 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1245/16TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 24 September 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 227568 STE 32 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 1 October 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 256312 STE 32 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 4 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
20 216458 STE 19 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	9 November 2020	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A1245/16TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	19 December 2016	Closed Approved
15 227568 STE 32 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	24 September 2015	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
12 256312 STE 32 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	1 October 2012	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 19

1 lobbied · 1 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 19: 1 lobbied and 1 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 19

1 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 19: 1 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	8	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 19

6 lobbied · 28 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 19: 6 lobbied and 28 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	6	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	28	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 19

7 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 19: 7 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 6 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	7	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.