Address · Ward 6 · James Pasternak
1875 Steeles Ave W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Location
- 43.78709, -79.46772
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
13These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Top 8Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 37 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Pasternak | Councillor staff | 52 | 19 | 4 March 2025 |
| Councillor James Pasternak | Councillor staff | 37 | 7 | 7 January 2022 |
| Olivia Chow | Councillor staff | 33 | 11 | 11 November 2025 |
| James Pasternak | Member of council | 21 | 12 | 4 March 2025 |
| Ward 6 York Centre | Member of council | 17 | 10 | 7 January 2022 |
| Brad Bradford | Councillor staff | 16 | 6 | 10 November 2025 |
| Shelley Carroll | Councillor staff | 16 | 5 | 13 November 2025 |
| Chris Moise | Councillor staff | 13 | 9 | 13 November 2025 |
| Gord Perks | Member of council | 13 | 6 | 12 November 2025 |
| Gord Perks | Councillor staff | 11 | 1 | 12 November 2025 |
| Mike Colle | Councillor staff | 9 | 0 | 13 November 2025 |
| Amber Morley | Councillor staff | 7 | 1 | 12 November 2025 |
| Josh Matlow | Councillor staff | 7 | 4 | 13 November 2025 |
| Jon Burnside | Councillor staff | 6 | 2 | 23 July 2024 |
| Josh Matlow | Member of council | 6 | 2 | 13 November 2025 |
| Shelley Carroll | Member of council | 6 | 5 | 19 August 2024 |
| Dianne Saxe | Member of council | 4 | 1 | 25 July 2024 |
| Jamaal Myers | Councillor staff | 4 | 1 | 12 November 2025 |
| Lily Cheng | Councillor staff | 4 | 0 | 8 July 2024 |
| Alejandra Bravo | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 10 November 2025 |
| Brad Bradford | Member of council | 3 | 2 | 18 April 2024 |
| Environment and Climate | City staff | 2 | 2 | 12 July 2024 |
| Alejandra Bravo | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 24 July 2024 |
| Ausma Malik | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 24 July 2024 |
| Ausma Malik | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 24 July 2024 |
| Dianne Saxe | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 18 February 2025 |
| Jamaal Myers | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 24 July 2024 |
| Jennifer McKelvie | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 24 July 2024 |
| Jennifer McKelvie | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 24 July 2024 |
| Paul Ainslie | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 23 July 2024 |
| Paula Fletcher | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 24 July 2024 |
| Paula Fletcher | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 24 July 2024 |
| Development Review | City staff | 1 | 0 | 17 July 2024 |
| Economic Development & Culture | City staff | 1 | 0 | 8 July 2024 |
| Jon Burnside | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 6 June 2024 |
| Olivia Chow | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 19 July 2024 |
| Paul Ainslie | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 23 July 2024 |
All registrations· 13 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM37283 | Dufferin & Steeles Corporation | 1875 Steeles Avenue West. | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 5 January 2026 – 5 January 2027 | 0 |
| SM37284 | Dufferin & Steeles Corporation | 1875 Steeles Avenue West. | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 5 January 2026 – 5 January 2027 | 0 |
| SM37285 | Dufferin & Steeles Corporation | 1875 Steeles Avenue West. | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 5 January 2026 – 5 January 2027 | 0 |
| SM37128 | Tenblock Management LP | 1875 Steeles Ave. W. | Planning and Development; Planning and Development, Combined Application | 6 November 2025 – 31 December 2026 | 5 |
| SM37076 | Tenblock Developments | 1875 Steeles Ave. W. | Planning and Development; Planning and Development, Combined Application | 21 October 2025 – 12 December 2025 | 22 |
| SM36331 | Tenblock Management LP | 1875 Steeles Avenue West | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 4 February 2025 – 19 February 2026 | 13 |
| SM35979 | Tenblock Developments | 1875 Steeles Ave West. | Planning and Development; Combined Application | 30 September 2024 – 1 April 2027 | 0 |
| SM35980 | Tenblock Developments | 1875 Steeles Ave West. | Planning and Development; Combined Application | 30 September 2024 – 31 March 2027 | 0 |
| SM35773 | Dufferin & Steeles Corporation | 1875 Steeles Avenue West. | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 19 July 2024 – 31 December 2026 | 0 |
| SM35753 | Dufferin & Steeles Corporation | 1875 Steeles Avenue West. | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 12 July 2024 – 6 January 2026 | 4 |
| SM35533 | Tenblock Developments | 1875 Steeles Ave W | Environment; Parks / Open Space; Planning and Development | 23 April 2024 – 31 December 2024 | 5 |
| SM35248 | Tenblock Developments | 1875 Steeles Avenue West | Planning and Development; Combined Application | 24 January 2024 – 28 February 2025 | 146 |
| SM30359 | Tenblock | 1875 Steeles Avenue West | Planning and Development; Combined Application | 21 July 2020 – 31 December 2024 | 120 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 26 November 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 242111 NNY 06 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 30 October 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 213392 NNY 06 OZOMB Appeal · In progress
- Submitted 30 October 2020Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 20 213394 NNY 06 SBUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 242111 NNY 06 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 26 November 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 20 213392 NNY 06 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 October 2020 | OMB Appeal In progress |
| 20 213394 NNY 06 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 30 October 2020 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
- 1875 Steeles Avenue West - Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion Applications - Decision Report - Approval2024.NY15.4 · 9 July 2024
- Comments on the Request for a Minister's Zoning Order to Restrict Building Heights - 1875 Steeles Avenue West to Protect Operational Viability of the Sanofi Pasteur Limited Manufacturing Facilities and Headquarters - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin2025.MM34.11 · 13 November 2025
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 6
17 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 6
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.