Address · Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
1861 O'Connor Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
- Location
- 43.72152, -79.30336
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Janet Davis, Ward 31 | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 18 April 2018 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM28165 | 10285773 Canada Corp | 1861 O'Connor Drive | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 10 May 2019 – 10 May 2020 | 0 |
| SM26040 | 10285773 Canada Corp | 1861 O'Connor Drive. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 9 April 2018 – 10 April 2019 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 13 May 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 145157 NNY 16 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 17 December 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 269227 NNY 16 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 145157 NNY 16 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 13 May 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 18 269227 NNY 16 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 17 December 2018 | Council Approved Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1861 O'connor Dr · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 145157 NNY 16 SA · submitted 13 May 2020 · Closed · from registration SM28165 (10285773 Canada Corp)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28165: Discuss development application at 1861 O'Connor Drive, Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 145157 NNY 16 SA at 1861 O'connor Dr: Site Plan application for the proposal to permit a 9-storey mixed use building containing 252 residential units, one commercial unit on the ground floor and three levels of underground parking. See associated Rezoning Application (File No. 18 269227 NNY 16 OZ) The application has been appealed to t… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Discuss development application at 1861 O'Connor Drive, Toronto.
Matched fields
- address
- 1861 OCONNOR DR
- application_address
- 1861 OCONNOR DR
1861 O'connor Dr · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
18 269227 NNY 16 OZ · submitted 17 December 2018 · Council Approved · from registration SM28165 (10285773 Canada Corp)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM28165: Discuss development application at 1861 O'Connor Drive, Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 269227 NNY 16 OZ at 1861 O'connor Dr: Original application for a 10 storey mixed use building containing 222 residential units, one commercial unit on the ground floor and three levels of underground parking. Proposal has been revised and is now for a 9-storey building containing 252 dwelling units and 122 square metres of retail space… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Discuss development application at 1861 O'Connor Drive, Toronto.
Matched fields
- address
- 1861 OCONNOR DR
- application_address
- 1861 OCONNOR DR
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16
10 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16
4 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.