Address · Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
186 Ellerslie Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Location
- 43.76989, -79.42200
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
10- Submitted 14 May 2024Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5438463Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 30 April 2024Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0022/24NYConditional Consent · Approved
- Submitted 25 April 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0224/24NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 25 April 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0225/24NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 14 January 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0038/20NYClosed · Refused
- Submitted 14 January 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0039/20NYClosed · Refused
- Submitted 14 January 2020Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0001/20NYTLAB Appeal · Refused
- Submitted 4 December 2019Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4690984Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 4 December 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4690990Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 4 December 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4690991Cancelled · Withdrawn
Data table· 10 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| COA-5438463 Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 14 May 2024 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| B0022/24NY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 30 April 2024 | Conditional Consent Approved |
| A0224/24NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 25 April 2024 | Closed Approved |
| A0225/24NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 25 April 2024 | Closed Approved |
| A0038/20NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 14 January 2020 | Closed Refused |
| A0039/20NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 14 January 2020 | Closed Refused |
| B0001/20NY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 14 January 2020 | TLAB Appeal Refused |
| COA-4690984 Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 4 December 2019 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| COA-4690990 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 4 December 2019 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| COA-4690991 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 4 December 2019 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 18
9 lobbied · 202 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 202 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.