Address · Ward 4 · Gord Perks
1844 Bloor St. W.
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 4 · Gord Perks
- Location
- 43.65420, -79.46335
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 1840 BLOOR ST W (4 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 12 York South-Weston | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 18 May 2012 |
| Ward 13 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 6 January 2011 |
| Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 18 May 2012 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM18096 | The Daniels Corporation | 1844 Bloor St. W. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 10 May 2012 – 10 August 2012 | 2 |
| SM15566 | The Daniels Corporation | 1844 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 1 January 2011 – 31 December 2012 | 4 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 6 March 2015Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 15 124671 WET 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 8 November 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 307024 WET 13 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 September 2010Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 10 261248 WET 13 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 124671 WET 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 6 March 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 307024 WET 13 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 8 November 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 10 261248 WET 13 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 20 September 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1844 Bloor St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
11 307024 WET 13 SA · submitted 8 November 2011 · Closed · from registration SM15566 (The Daniels Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15566: Address: 1844 Bloor Street West, Toronto, ON Offical Plan Amendment Zoning By-law Amendment Site-Plan Approval (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 307024 WET 13 SA at 1844 Bloor St W: Draft Plan of Condominium relating to a 14-storey apartment building containing 387 units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Address: 1844 Bloor Street West, Toronto, ON Offical Plan Amendment Zoning By-law Amendment Site-Plan Approval
Matched fields
- address
- 1844 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1844 BLOOR ST W
1844 Bloor St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
10 261248 WET 13 OZ · submitted 20 September 2010 · Closed · from registration SM15566 (The Daniels Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15566: Address: 1844 Bloor Street West, Toronto, ON Offical Plan Amendment Zoning By-law Amendment Site-Plan Approval (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 261248 WET 13 OZ at 1844 Bloor St W: Proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit the development of a mixed-use building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Address: 1844 Bloor Street West, Toronto, ON Offical Plan Amendment Zoning By-law Amendment Site-Plan Approval
Matched fields
- address
- 1844 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1844 BLOOR ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 4
1 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4
17 lobbied · 33 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 33 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4
12 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.