1785 Finch Ave W

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 1; 1 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 2; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 1; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
Location: 43.75897, -79.50736
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

New Commons DevelopmentSM34033 · 10 January 20231

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Anthony Perruzza1

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Anthony Perruzza	Member of council	1	1	10 January 2023

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM34033	New Commons Development	1785 Finch Avenue West.	Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan	10 January 2023 – 15 July 2024	1

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 23 November 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0482/23EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 12 March 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0133/19EYKClosed · Approved

Data table· 2 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0482/23EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	23 November 2023	Closed Approved
A0133/19EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	12 March 2019	Closed Approved

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

Proposed Land Lease with the Community Music Schools of Toronto at 1785 Finch Avenue West
2024.EX19.21 · 17 December 2024

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 7

1 lobbied · 17 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 7: 1 lobbied and 17 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	17	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.