Address · Ward 6 · James Pasternak
1755 Steeles Ave W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Location
- 43.78466, -79.46268
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 28 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic Development and Culture Division | City staff | 46 | 21 | 24 April 2026 |
| Economic Development & Culture | City staff | 19 | 1 | 24 July 2018 |
| Economic Development and Culture | City staff | 14 | 7 | 22 January 2024 |
| Ward 10 York Centre | Member of council | 11 | 3 | 27 April 2018 |
| James Pasternak | Member of council | 11 | 7 | 16 September 2026 |
| Olivia Chow | Councillor staff | 10 | 3 | 12 November 2025 |
| James Pasternak | Councillor staff | 8 | 2 | 10 November 2025 |
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 5 | 1 | 3 March 2023 |
| Shelley Carroll | Member of council | 5 | 4 | 5 March 2026 |
| Office of Councillor Pasternak | Councillor staff | 4 | 0 | 2 May 2018 |
| Ward 37 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 3 | 1 | 6 July 2018 |
| Olivia Chow | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 16 September 2026 |
| Shelley Carroll | Councillor staff | 3 | 2 | 5 March 2026 |
| Engineering Construction Services | City staff | 2 | 0 | 11 April 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Thompson | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 8 April 2018 |
| Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 11 January 2017 |
| Ward 24 Willowdale | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 11 April 2017 |
| Ward 8 York West | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 12 June 2017 |
| Business Growth Services | City staff | 1 | 1 | 6 December 2024 |
| Engineering & Construction Services | City staff | 1 | 1 | 31 March 2017 |
| Office of Councillor Carmichael-Greb Ward 16 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 8 June 2017 |
| Mayor | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 2 May 2018 |
| Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 26 May 2017 |
| Ward 25 Don Valley West | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 26 May 2017 |
| Ward 26 Don Valley West | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 26 May 2017 |
| Ward 34 Don Valley East | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 11 January 2017 |
| Ward 9 York Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 26 May 2017 |
| Jon Burnside | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 5 July 2024 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM36241 | Sanofi Vaccines Canada Ltd. | 1755 Steeles Avenue W. | Economic Development; Planning and Development; Public Health | 6 January 2025 – 31 December 2026 | 25 |
| SM30503 | Sanofi Vaccines Canada Ltd. | 1755 Steeles Avenue W. | Economic Development; Planning and Development Application | 27 August 2020 – 31 December 2026 | 78 |
| SM23610 | sanofi pasteur limited | 1755 Steeles Avenue West | Building Permits; Economic Development; Planning and Development, Combined Application | 14 October 2016 – 27 February 2026 | 59 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
10- Submitted 6 May 2022Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0020/22NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 6 April 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 136188 NNY 06 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 26 October 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 210682 NNY 06 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 26 October 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 210685 NNY 06 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 26 October 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 210843 NNY 06 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 21 July 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0688/17NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 1 November 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 245598 NNY 10 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 1 November 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 245607 NNY 10 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 24 December 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 269026 NNY 10 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 1 August 2008Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 08 189386 NNY 10 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 10 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0020/22NY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 6 May 2022 | Closed Approved |
| 21 136188 NNY 06 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 6 April 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 20 210682 NNY 06 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 26 October 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 20 210685 NNY 06 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 26 October 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 20 210843 NNY 06 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 26 October 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0688/17NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 21 July 2017 | Closed Approved |
| 16 245598 NNY 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 1 November 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 245607 NNY 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 1 November 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 269026 NNY 10 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 24 December 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 189386 NNY 10 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 1 August 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 6
17 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 6
2 lobbied · 14 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 14 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.