Address · Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
17 Rhodes Ave
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
- Location
- 43.66695, -79.31764
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM32847 | Percy Ellis Holdings Inc | 17 Rhodes Ave. | Planning and Development Application | 1 January 2022 – 31 December 2026 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
10- Submitted 1 April 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0250/26TEYHearing Scheduled · In progress
- Submitted 18 August 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0938/22TEYApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
- Submitted 11 May 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 145504 STE 14 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 25 October 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1038/16TEYClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 25 October 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1039/16TEYClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 25 October 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1040/16TEYClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 25 October 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1041/16TEYClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 25 October 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1042/16TEYClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 25 October 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1043/16TEYClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 25 October 2016Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0071/16TEYClosed · Withdrawn
Data table· 10 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0250/26TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 1 April 2026 | Hearing Scheduled In progress |
| A0938/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 18 August 2022 | Application Withdrawn Withdrawn |
| 22 145504 STE 14 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 11 May 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| A1038/16TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 25 October 2016 | Closed Withdrawn |
| A1039/16TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 25 October 2016 | Closed Withdrawn |
| A1040/16TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 25 October 2016 | Closed Withdrawn |
| A1041/16TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 25 October 2016 | Closed Withdrawn |
| A1042/16TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 25 October 2016 | Closed Withdrawn |
| A1043/16TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 25 October 2016 | Closed Withdrawn |
| B0071/16TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 25 October 2016 | Closed Withdrawn |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 14
4 lobbied · 69 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 69 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 14
17 lobbied · 35 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 35 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 14
2 lobbied · 32 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 32 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.