Address · Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
17 Fairmeadow Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Location
- 43.75469, -79.39721
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 25 Don Valley West | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 16 October 2012 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM18078 | Sorbara Group of Companies | 17 Fairmeadow Avenue | Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development App… | 24 May 2012 – 30 December 2016 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 22 December 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 329800 NNY 25 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 22 December 2011Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 11 329814 NNY 25 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 329800 NNY 25 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 December 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 329814 NNY 25 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 22 December 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
17 Fairmeadow Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 329800 NNY 25 OZ · submitted 22 December 2011 · Closed · from registration SM18078 (Sorbara Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18078: 17 Fairmeadow Avenue (also known as 9 Fairmeadow) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 329800 NNY 25 OZ at 17 Fairmeadow Ave: Proposal is to subdivide the southern portion of the existing school site into 12 lots. A new public road is proposed. It is proposed to construct a single family dwelling on each of the lots. The existing school building would continue to operate on the northern portion of the site. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 17 Fairmeadow Avenue (also known as 9 Fairmeadow)
Matched fields
- address
- 17 FAIRMEADOW AVE
- application_address
- 17 FAIRMEADOW AVE
17 Fairmeadow Ave · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
11 329814 NNY 25 SB · submitted 22 December 2011 · Closed · from registration SM18078 (Sorbara Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18078: 17 Fairmeadow Avenue (also known as 9 Fairmeadow) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 329814 NNY 25 SB at 17 Fairmeadow Ave: Proposal is to subdivide the southern portion of the existing school site into 12 lots. A new public road is proposed. It is proposed to construct a single family dwelling on each of the lots.The existing school building would continue to operate on the northern portion of the site. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 17 Fairmeadow Avenue (also known as 9 Fairmeadow)
Matched fields
- address
- 17 FAIRMEADOW AVE
- application_address
- 17 FAIRMEADOW AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15
20 lobbied · 36 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 15% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 36 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 30% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.