Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
1650 Dupont St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.66492, -79.45610
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 30 April 2025Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 25 151849 STE 09 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 1 August 2023Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 23 183066 STE 09 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 January 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0093/22TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 16 August 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 198981 STE 09 SAOMB Appeal · In progress
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 151849 STE 09 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 April 2025 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 23 183066 STE 09 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 1 August 2023 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0093/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 20 January 2022 | Closed Approved |
| 21 198981 STE 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 16 August 2021 | OMB Appeal In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1648 Dupont St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
25 151849 STE 09 OZ · submitted 30 April 2025 · Closed · from registration SM35956 (Dupont Dev LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35956: Planning application associated with the redevelopment 1648-1664 Dupont Street, Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 25 151849 STE 09 OZ at 1648 Dupont St: Zoning By-law Amendment for an 11-storey mixed-use building. The proposal is comprised of approximately 10,776.3 square metres of gross floor area ("GFA"), resulting in a density of approximately 5.59 Floor Space Index ("FSI"). The proposal includes approximately 10,434.6 square metres of residenti… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning application associated with the redevelopment 1648-1664 Dupont Street, Toronto.
Matched fields
- address
- 1648-1664 DUPONT ST
- application_address
- 1648 DUPONT ST
1648 Dupont St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
25 151849 STE 09 OZ · submitted 30 April 2025 · Closed · from registration SM35957 (Dupont Dev LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35957: Planning application associated with the redevelopment 1648-1664 Dupont Street, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 25 151849 STE 09 OZ at 1648 Dupont St: Zoning By-law Amendment for an 11-storey mixed-use building. The proposal is comprised of approximately 10,776.3 square metres of gross floor area ("GFA"), resulting in a density of approximately 5.59 Floor Space Index ("FSI"). The proposal includes approximately 10,434.6 square metres of residenti… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning application associated with the redevelopment 1648-1664 Dupont Street, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 1648-1664 DUPONT ST
- application_address
- 1648 DUPONT ST
1660 Dupont St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
23 183066 STE 09 OZ · submitted 1 August 2023 · Closed · from registration SM35956 (Dupont Dev LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35956: Planning application associated with the redevelopment 1648-1664 Dupont Street, Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 183066 STE 09 OZ at 1660 Dupont St: Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment for a 10 storey mixed use building with 418square metres of ground floor retail and 183 dwelling units. The Official Plan Amendment proposes to redesignate lands at 3 Osler St from Neighbourhoods to Mixed Use Areas. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning application associated with the redevelopment 1648-1664 Dupont Street, Toronto.
Matched fields
- address
- 1648-1664 DUPONT ST
- application_address
- 1664 DUPONT ST
1660 Dupont St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
23 183066 STE 09 OZ · submitted 1 August 2023 · Closed · from registration SM35957 (Dupont Dev LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35957: Planning application associated with the redevelopment 1648-1664 Dupont Street, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 183066 STE 09 OZ at 1660 Dupont St: Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment for a 10 storey mixed use building with 418square metres of ground floor retail and 183 dwelling units. The Official Plan Amendment proposes to redesignate lands at 3 Osler St from Neighbourhoods to Mixed Use Areas. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning application associated with the redevelopment 1648-1664 Dupont Street, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 1648-1664 DUPONT ST
- application_address
- 1664 DUPONT ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9
19 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9
27 lobbied · 333 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 27 | 169 | 67% (n=27) | 33% | 26% | 29% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 333 | 134 | 95% (n=279) | 5% | 6% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.