Address · Ward 8 · Mike Colle
165 Tycos Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Location
- 43.70284, -79.46399
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Colle | Councillor staff | 14 | 0 | 11 June 2024 |
| Mike Colle | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 8 January 2024 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35076 | Anatolia Capital Inc | 165 Tycos Drive | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Applicatio… | 28 November 2023 – 27 June 2024 | 15 |
| SM33469 | Annatolia Tile | 165 Tycos Drive | Planning and Development Application | 15 July 2022 – 1 July 2023 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 17 October 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0522/24NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 19 December 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 240925 NNY 08 SANOAC Issued · Approved
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0522/24NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 17 October 2024 | Closed Approved |
| 22 240925 NNY 08 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 19 December 2022 | NOAC Issued Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
165 Tycos Dr · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 240925 NNY 08 SA · submitted 19 December 2022 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM35076 (Anatolia Capital Inc)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35076: 165 Tycos Drive site plan conditions and environmental assessments (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 240925 NNY 08 SA at 165 Tycos Dr: Site Plan Approval application to permit a 5-storey office building. The proposed development has a gross floor area of 4309.33 square metres and includes 34 parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 165 Tycos Drive site plan conditions and environmental assessments
Matched fields
- address
- 165 TYCOS DR
- application_address
- 165 TYCOS DR
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 8
7 lobbied · 357 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 357 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8
25 lobbied · 69 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 25 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 8% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 4% | 0.00 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.