Address · Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers

165 Tapscott Rd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 3; 2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 3; 2 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 7; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
Location: 43.80520, -79.22527
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Tapscott Birch Properties inc.SM20254 · 4 April 20143
Ambria Homes Inc.SM36706 · 12 June 20250
Ambria Homes Inc.SM29551 · 1 January 20200

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Office of Councillor Cho, Ward 422
Ward 42 Scarborough-Rouge River1

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Office of Councillor Cho, Ward 42	Councillor staff	2	2	8 April 2014
Ward 42 Scarborough-Rouge River	Member of council	1	1	8 April 2014

All registrations· 3 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM36706	Ambria Homes Inc.	165 Tapscott Road.	Planning and Development Application; Site Plan	12 June 2025 – 31 October 2026	0
SM29551	Ambria Homes Inc.	165 Tapscott Road	Planning and Development Application, Site Plan	1 January 2020 – 30 October 2022	0
SM20254	Tapscott Birch Properties inc.	165 Tapscott Road	Planning and Development, Combined Application	4 April 2014 – 15 April 2019	3

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 8 January 2025Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 25 102528 ESC 23 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 9 March 2022Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 22 120941 ESC 23 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 29 September 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0324/21SCClosed · Approved
Submitted 15 October 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0244/20SCClosed · Approved
Submitted 27 January 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0024/20SCClosed · Approved
Submitted 10 March 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0079/17SCClosed · Approved
Submitted 31 December 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 282160 ESC 42 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 7 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
25 102528 ESC 23 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	8 January 2025	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
22 120941 ESC 23 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	9 March 2022	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0324/21SC Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	29 September 2021	Closed Approved
A0244/20SC Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	15 October 2020	Closed Approved
A0024/20SC Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	27 January 2020	Closed Approved
A0079/17SC Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	10 March 2017	Closed Approved
13 282160 ESC 42 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	31 December 2013	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 2 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 23

3 lobbied · 32 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 23: 3 lobbied and 32 matched unlobbied applications in 3 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	3	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	32	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 23

2 lobbied · 2 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 23: 2 lobbied and 2 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.