Address · Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
1602 Queen St E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
- Location
- 43.66638, -79.31718
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 15 August 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0916/22TEYApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
- Submitted 11 October 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0953/18TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 8 March 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 126761 STE 32 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 December 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1422/17TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 28 December 2017Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0131/17TEYClosed · Approved
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0916/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 15 August 2022 | Application Withdrawn Withdrawn |
| A0953/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 11 October 2018 | Closed Approved |
| 18 126761 STE 32 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 8 March 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A1422/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 28 December 2017 | Closed Approved |
| B0131/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 28 December 2017 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1602 Queen St E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 126761 STE 32 SA · submitted 8 March 2018 · Closed · from registration SM24888 (Waverley Cottage Holdings Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24888: 1602/1604 Queen Street East - minor variances, severances, site plan approvals (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 126761 STE 32 SA at 1602 Queen St E: Site Plan Approval for a new 6-storey mixed use building (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1602/1604 Queen Street East - minor variances, severances, site plan approvals
Matched fields
- address
- 1604 QUEEN ST E
- application_address
- 1604 QUEEN ST E
1602 Queen St E · Consent (severance) (CO)
B0131/17TEY · submitted 28 December 2017 · Closed · from registration SM24888 (Waverley Cottage Holdings Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24888: 1602/1604 Queen Street East - minor variances, severances, site plan approvals (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application B0131/17TEY at 1602 Queen St E: To obtain consent for a technical severance to re-establish two lots which merged on title and to create two access easements. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1602/1604 Queen Street East - minor variances, severances, site plan approvals
Matched fields
- address
- 1604 QUEEN ST E
- application_address
- 1602 QUEEN ST E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 14
4 lobbied · 69 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 69 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 14
17 lobbied · 35 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 35 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 14
2 lobbied · 32 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 32 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.