Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik

16 York St

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 3; 2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 5; 4 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 5; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Location: 43.64234, -79.38165
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

The Cadillac Fairview Corporation LimitedSM24891 · 24 July 20174
Lanterra DevelopmentsSM21773 · 8 May 20151
Lanterra DevelopmentsSM10393 · 11 February 20080

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Joe Cressy, Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina2
Chief of Staff, Mayor's Office1
Joe Cressy, Councillor Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina1
Office of Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 201

Data table· 4 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Joe Cressy, Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina	Councillor staff	2	2	24 July 2017
Chief of Staff, Mayor's Office	Councillor staff	1	1	19 July 2018
Joe Cressy, Councillor Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina	Councillor staff	1	1	24 July 2017
Office of Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 20	Councillor staff	1	1	8 May 2015

All registrations· 3 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM24891	The Cadillac Fairview Corporation Limited	16 York Street	Economic Development; Signs; Transportation - Roads / Bridges	24 July 2017 – 31 December 2026	4
SM21773	Lanterra Developments	16 York Street	Planning and Development, Combined Application; Transportation - Roads / Bridges	8 May 2015 – 31 July 2027	1
SM10393	Lanterra Developments	16 York Street	planning act application - official plan & zoning by-law	11 February 2008 – 11 February 2009	0

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 24 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1321/17TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 8 June 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 213852 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 30 December 2009Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 09 200568 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 21 August 2009Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 09 161101 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 4 January 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 100769 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 5 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A1321/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	24 November 2017	Closed Approved
11 213852 STE 20 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	8 June 2011	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
09 200568 STE 20 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	30 December 2009	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
09 161101 STE 20 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	21 August 2009	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
08 100769 STE 20 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	4 January 2008	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

16 York St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 100769 STE 20 OZ · submitted 4 January 2008 · Closed · from registration SM10393 (Lanterra Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM10393: OPA & ZBA applications respecting 16 York Street [Block 9] (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 100769 STE 20 OZ at 16 York St: Proposed 65-storey condominium building with 593 dwelling units, a 55-storey condominium building with 503 dwelling units & a 31-storey mixed non-residential building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: OPA & ZBA applications respecting 16 York Street [Block 9]
Matched fields
address
16 YORK ST
application_address
16 YORK ST

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10

20 lobbied · 261 matched

Median days

Lobbied136
Matched, unlobbied138

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=20
Matched, unlobbied93% n=214

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Objection rate

Lobbied14%
Matched, unlobbied18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10: 20 lobbied and 261 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	20	136	100% (n=20)	0%	0%	14%
Matched, unlobbied	261	138	93% (n=214)	7%	5%	18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	66	—	100% (n=5)	0%	3%	0.05
Matched, unlobbied	165	—	100% (n=11)	0%	2%	0.04

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied10%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	88	—	100% (n=7)	0%	10%	0.03
Matched, unlobbied	94	—	100% (n=7)	0%	5%	0.01

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

About this address

Registrations that mention this address

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Linked lobbying registrations

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Council and committee items naming this address

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide