Address · Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
16 Presteign Ave
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
- Location
- 43.70501, -79.32001
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM25637 | Laurentide Development Corp. | 16 Presteign Avenue | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 9 February 2018 – 31 January 2020 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
13- Submitted 20 July 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0708/18TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 20 July 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0709/18TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 20 July 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0710/18TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 20 July 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0711/18TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 20 July 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0712/18TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 20 July 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0713/18TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 20 July 2018Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0071/18TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 27 March 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0393/18TEYClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 27 March 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0394/18TEYClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 27 March 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0395/18TEYClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 27 March 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0396/18TEYClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 27 March 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0398/18TEYClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 27 March 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0399/18TEYClosed · Withdrawn
Data table· 13 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0708/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 20 July 2018 | Closed Approved |
| A0709/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 20 July 2018 | Closed Approved |
| A0710/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 20 July 2018 | Closed Approved |
| A0711/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 20 July 2018 | Closed Approved |
| A0712/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 20 July 2018 | Closed Approved |
| A0713/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 20 July 2018 | Closed Approved |
| B0071/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 20 July 2018 | Closed Approved |
| A0393/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 27 March 2018 | Closed Withdrawn |
| A0394/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 27 March 2018 | Closed Withdrawn |
| A0395/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 27 March 2018 | Closed Withdrawn |
| A0396/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 27 March 2018 | Closed Withdrawn |
| A0398/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 27 March 2018 | Closed Withdrawn |
| A0399/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 27 March 2018 | Closed Withdrawn |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 19
1 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 19
2 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.