Address · Ward 6 · James Pasternak
155 Antibes Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Location
- 43.78208, -79.44591
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 9 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Pasternak | Councillor staff | 22 | 3 | 24 July 2024 |
| Ward 6 York Centre | Member of council | 6 | 3 | 25 March 2022 |
| Councillor James Pasternak | Councillor staff | 5 | 2 | 3 September 2021 |
| James Pasternak | Member of council | 5 | 1 | 24 July 2024 |
| Councillor Pasternak | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 31 March 2022 |
| James Pasternak | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 28 October 2021 |
| Jon Burnside | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 2 July 2024 |
| Shelley Carroll | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 2 July 2024 |
| Shelley Carroll | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 2 July 2024 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM32214 | 155 Antibes Developments Inc. | 155 Antibes Drive | Planning and Development Application; Zoning By-law | 16 August 2021 – 9 February 2023 | 1 |
| SM30360 | Tenblock | 155 Antibes Drive | Planning and Development; Combined Application | 21 July 2020 – 31 December 2024 | 43 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 20 March 2023Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 23 124738 NNY 06 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 5 November 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 234538 NNY 06 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 124738 NNY 06 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 20 March 2023 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 234538 NNY 06 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 5 November 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
155 Antibes Dr · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 234538 NNY 06 OZ · submitted 5 November 2021 · Closed · from registration SM32214 (155 Antibes Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32214: 155 Antibes Drive redevelopment (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 234538 NNY 06 OZ at 155 Antibes Dr: Zoning By-law amendment for two mixed use buildings and one residential building in addition to the existing residential building on the property.Building A is a 36-storey tower (112.8 metres) with a six-storey podium, 432 residential units, and 486 m2 of retail.Building B is a 32-storey tower (108… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 155 Antibes Drive redevelopment
Matched fields
- address
- 155 ANTIBES DR
- application_address
- 155 ANTIBES DR
Council and committee items naming this address
- 155 Antibes Drive - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval2024.NY15.3 · 24 July 2024
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 6
17 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.