Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
153 Vaughan Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.68538, -79.42154
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 9 October 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 205133 STE 12 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 9 March 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 125200 STE 21 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 205133 STE 12 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 9 October 2020 | Under Review In progress |
| 15 125200 STE 21 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 9 March 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
147 Vaughan Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 205133 STE 12 SA · submitted 9 October 2020 · Under Review · from registration SM31151 (NJS Capital Management Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31151: Redevelopment of 147 - 153 Vaughan Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 205133 STE 12 SA at 147 Vaughan Rd: INACTIVE Current May/June 2024 proposal - 12-storey residential buidling containing 80 rental dwelling units (including 20 rental replacement units), 12 parking spaces and 85 bike parking spacesJan 2024 Proposal - 12-storey (40.6 metres including mechanical penthouse) residential building containin… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 147 - 153 Vaughan Road.
Matched fields
- address
- 147-153 VAUGHAN RD
- application_address
- 147 VAUGHAN RD
147 Vaughan Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 205133 STE 12 SA · submitted 9 October 2020 · Under Review · from registration SM31165 (NJS Capital Management Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31165: Redevelopment of 147 - 153 Vaughan Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 205133 STE 12 SA at 147 Vaughan Rd: INACTIVE Current May/June 2024 proposal - 12-storey residential buidling containing 80 rental dwelling units (including 20 rental replacement units), 12 parking spaces and 85 bike parking spacesJan 2024 Proposal - 12-storey (40.6 metres including mechanical penthouse) residential building containin… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 147 - 153 Vaughan Road.
Matched fields
- address
- 147-153 VAUGHAN RD
- application_address
- 147 VAUGHAN RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.