Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
150 Bronoco Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.68533, -79.46130
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 17 Davenport | Member of council | 9 | 8 | 26 June 2017 |
| Ward 17 | Councillor staff | 3 | 2 | 26 June 2017 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM23114 | I2 Developments Inc. | 150 Bronoco Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 2 June 2016 – 31 December 2026 | 10 |
| SM22438 | ANEW Building Corporation | 150 Bronoco Ave. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 5 November 2015 – 5 November 2019 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 12 May 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 154617 WET 17 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 154617 WET 17 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 12 May 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
150 Bronoco Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 154617 WET 17 OZ · submitted 12 May 2016 · Closed · from registration SM22438 (ANEW Building Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22438: OPA/Zoning applications in support of redevelopment of 150 Bronoco Ave. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 154617 WET 17 OZ at 150 Bronoco Ave: Proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-laws to permit the development of a 6-storey residential building (84 units) with a total gross floor area of 6,685.07 square metres. A total of 113 parking spaces are proposed (surface parking lot and 2 level underground parking garage). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: OPA/Zoning applications in support of redevelopment of 150 Bronoco Ave.
Matched fields
- address
- 150 BRONOCO AVE
- application_address
- 150 BRONOCO AVE
150 Bronoco Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 154617 WET 17 OZ · submitted 12 May 2016 · Closed · from registration SM23114 (I2 Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23114: Discuss Planning Applications for 150 Bronoco Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 154617 WET 17 OZ at 150 Bronoco Ave: Proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-laws to permit the development of a 6-storey residential building (84 units) with a total gross floor area of 6,685.07 square metres. A total of 113 parking spaces are proposed (surface parking lot and 2 level underground parking garage). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Discuss Planning Applications for 150 Bronoco Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 150 BRONOCO AVE
- application_address
- 150 BRONOCO AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9
19 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.