Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
15 York St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64234, -79.38087
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Troisi | Councillor staff | 6 | 3 | 30 April 2018 |
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 6 | 3 | 20 July 2018 |
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 1 April 2011 |
| Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 20 July 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 20 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 8 May 2015 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM25702 | Maple Leaf Sports &Entertainment Ltd. | 15 York Street | Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 1 March 2018 – 30 June 2027 | 0 |
| SM25414 | Maple Leaf Sports &Entertainment Ltd. | 15 York Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 8 December 2017 – 29 June 2019 | 14 |
| SM21773 | Lanterra Developments | 15 York Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application; Transportation - Roads / Bridges | 8 May 2015 – 31 July 2027 | 1 |
| SM21280 | Lanterra Developments | 15 York Street | Licences / Licensing; Real Estate / Property (City-owned) | 15 January 2015 – 31 July 2027 | 0 |
| SM14845 | Maple Leaf Sports &Entertainment Ltd. | 15 York Street. | Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 9 August 2010 – 30 June 2011 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 18 December 2025Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0005/26TEYPostponed · In progress
- Submitted 3 October 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1085/22TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 25 September 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0946/18TEYClosed · Approved
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0005/26TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 18 December 2025 | Postponed In progress |
| A1085/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 3 October 2022 | Closed Approved |
| A0946/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 25 September 2018 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10
20 lobbied · 261 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 136 | 100% (n=20) | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 261 | 138 | 93% (n=214) | 7% | 5% | 18% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.