Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik

15 Queens Quay E

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 2; 2 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 7; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Location: 43.64196, -79.37370
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Pier 27 Toronto (North) Inc.SM28363 · 10 June 20192

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Office of Councillor Cressy, Ward 101
Office of Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 101

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Office of Councillor Cressy, Ward 10	Councillor staff	1	0	24 June 2019
Office of Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 10	Councillor staff	1	0	28 June 2019

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM28363	Pier 27 Toronto (North) Inc.	15 Queens Quay East	Building Permits	10 June 2019 – 31 December 2020	2

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 4 February 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 112090 STE 10 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 17 July 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0789/19TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 12 July 2019Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 19 188033 STE 10 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 14 December 2018Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0113/18TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 21 July 2017Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0069/17TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 21 July 2017Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0070/17TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 7 April 2010Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 10 147097 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 7 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
20 112090 STE 10 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	4 February 2020	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0789/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	17 July 2019	Closed Approved
19 188033 STE 10 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	12 July 2019	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
B0113/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	14 December 2018	Closed Approved
B0069/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	21 July 2017	Closed Approved
B0070/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	21 July 2017	Closed Approved
10 147097 STE 28 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	7 April 2010	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

25 Queens Quay E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
10 147097 STE 28 SA · submitted 7 April 2010 · Closed · from registration SM14099 (Pier 27 Toronto (North) Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM14099: Site Plan, Zoning By-law and Official Plan amendment applications for new mixed use condominium buildings (Phase 2). Ongoing site plan application for Phase 1. Former address is 25 Queens Quay East, now numbered as 15, 29 and 29 Queens Quay East. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 147097 STE 28 SA at 25 Queens Quay E: Site Plan Approval Application for Pier 27 Phase 2: proposal for 3 new mixed use building containing retail at grade and 607 residentail units in 3 buildings comprising two 13-storey buildings and one 35-storey building. Gross Floor Area is 63,234 sq. m including 2,100 sq. m of retail space and a 5… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …cations for new mixed use condominium buildings (Phase 2). Ongoing site plan application for Phase 1. Former address is 25 Queens Quay East, now numbered as 15, 29 and 29 Queens Quay East.
Matched fields
address
25 QUEENS QUAY E
application_address
25 QUEENS QUAY E

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied1,881

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	66	—	100% (n=5)	0%	3%	0.05
Matched, unlobbied	165	1,881	100% (n=11)	0%	2%	0.04

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10

20 lobbied · 261 matched

Median days

Lobbied136
Matched, unlobbied138

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=20
Matched, unlobbied93% n=214

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Objection rate

Lobbied14%
Matched, unlobbied18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10: 20 lobbied and 261 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	20	136	100% (n=20)	0%	0%	14%
Matched, unlobbied	261	138	93% (n=214)	7%	5%	18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10

4 lobbied · 25 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10: 4 lobbied and 25 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	25	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 2 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

About this address

Registrations that mention this address

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Linked lobbying registrations

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Council and committee items naming this address

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

Committee of Adjustment applications

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide