Address · Ward 16 · Jon Burnside

15 Mallow Rd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 2; 2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 12; 5 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 6; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
Location: 43.74106, -79.34156
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Mattamy Homes LimitedSM23659 · 28 October 201610
La Citadelle Academy of Arts and ScienceSM19545 · 29 July 20132

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 34 Don Valley East6
Councillor Minnan-Wong3
Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong1
Office of Councillor Minnan-Wong, Ward 341
Office of Councillor Minnan-Wong, Ward 34, Ward1

Data table· 5 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 34 Don Valley East	Member of council	6	4	19 July 2018
Councillor Minnan-Wong	Councillor staff	3	0	10 July 2018
Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong	Councillor staff	1	1	27 July 2017
Office of Councillor Minnan-Wong, Ward 34	Councillor staff	1	0	22 April 2014
Office of Councillor Minnan-Wong, Ward 34, Ward	Councillor staff	1	0	2 December 2013

All registrations· 2 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM23659	Mattamy Homes Limited	15 Mallow Road	Planning and Development, Combined Application	28 October 2016 – 11 December 2020	10
SM19545	La Citadelle Academy of Arts and Science	15 Mallow Road	Parks / Open Space	29 July 2013 – 31 August 2014	2

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 16 July 2020Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 20 168566 NNY 16 PLClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 16 July 2020Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 20 168572 NNY 16 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 18 June 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 180190 NNY 34 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 20 September 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0868/17NYClosed · Approved
Submitted 30 May 2017Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 17 169632 NNY 34 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 16 December 2014Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 14 264875 NNY 34 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 6 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
20 168566 NNY 16 PL Development application	Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)	16 July 2020	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
20 168572 NNY 16 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	16 July 2020	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
18 180190 NNY 34 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	18 June 2018	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0868/17NY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	20 September 2017	Closed Approved
17 169632 NNY 34 SB Development application	Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)	30 May 2017	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
14 264875 NNY 34 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	16 December 2014	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide

2 lobbied · 6 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 2 rows

Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide: 2 lobbied and 6 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	6	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 2 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16

10 lobbied · 23 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16: 10 lobbied and 23 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	23	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 16

5 lobbied · 35 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 16: 5 lobbied and 35 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	5	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	35	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 16

2 lobbied · 4 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

16 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 16: 2 lobbied and 4 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide: 16 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	16	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	48	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16

4 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16: 4 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	8	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.