Address · Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
15 Mahoney Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
- Location
- 43.69100, -79.49929
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
8- Submitted 4 July 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0264/25EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 4 July 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0265/25EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 4 July 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0266/25EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 4 July 2025Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5665636Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 7 July 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0274/23EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 7 July 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0275/23EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 7 July 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0276/23EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 27 February 2023Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 23 117892 WET 05 PLUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 8 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0264/25EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 4 July 2025 | Closed Approved |
| A0265/25EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 4 July 2025 | Closed Approved |
| A0266/25EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 4 July 2025 | Closed Approved |
| COA-5665636 Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 4 July 2025 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| A0274/23EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 7 July 2023 | Closed Approved |
| A0275/23EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 7 July 2023 | Closed Approved |
| A0276/23EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 7 July 2023 | Closed Approved |
| 23 117892 WET 05 PL Development application | Part Lot Control Exemption (PL) | 27 February 2023 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 5
8 lobbied · 137 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 137 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 5
1 lobbied · 17 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.