1465 Lawrence Ave W

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 2; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 10; 1 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 4; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
Location: 43.70738, -79.48040
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

R & G Management Inc.SM18056 · 26 April 20125
R & G Management Inc.SM11223 · 11 February 20085

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 12 York South-Weston10

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 12 York South-Weston	Member of council	10	5	11 August 2014

All registrations· 2 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM18056	R & G Management Inc.	1465 Lawrence Avenue West	Planning and Development Application, Official Plan	26 April 2012 – 26 April 2015	5
SM11223	R & G Management Inc.	1465 Lawrence Avenue West	Planning Application - Official Plan Amendment, Draft Plan of Condominium, Committee of Adjustment	11 February 2008 – 23 June 2015	5

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 16 October 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0767/18EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 15 October 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4469949Cancelled · Withdrawn
Submitted 24 August 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0742/17EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 22 December 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 330266 WET 12 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 4 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0767/18EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	16 October 2018	Closed Approved
COA-4469949 Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	15 October 2018	Cancelled Withdrawn
A0742/17EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	24 August 2017	Closed Approved
11 330266 WET 12 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	22 December 2011	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 5

8 lobbied · 137 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 5: 8 lobbied and 137 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	8	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	137	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5

12 lobbied · 17 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5: 12 lobbied and 17 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	12	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	17	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.