Address · Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
141 Kingswood Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
- Location
- 43.67744, -79.28446
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 32 Beaches-East York | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 18 March 2009 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM12800 | Eric Zupnik | 141 Kingswood Rd | Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 3 March 2009 – 24 March 2009 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 29 December 2008Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 08 232068 STE 32 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08 232068 STE 32 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 29 December 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
141 Kingswood Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
08 232068 STE 32 SA · submitted 29 December 2008 · Closed · from registration SM12800 (Eric Zupnik)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM12800: Proposed new home at 141 Kingswood Rd to be built.I would like to request a meeting with the local councillor to present the drawings and discuss the merits of the application. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 232068 STE 32 SA at 141 Kingswood Rd: Proposal to construct a new detached SFD. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed new home at 141 Kingswood Rd to be built.I would like to request a meeting with the local councillor to present the drawings and discuss the merits …
Matched fields
- address
- 141 KINGSWOOD RD
- application_address
- 141 KINGSWOOD RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 19
6 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.