Address · Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers

1395 Tapscott Rd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 1; 1 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 9; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
Location: 43.83591, -79.24534
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Dr. Ramesh JollySM22480 · 12 November 20151

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 42 Scarborough-Rouge River1

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 42 Scarborough-Rouge River	Member of council	1	1	13 November 2015

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM22480	Dr. Ramesh Jolly	1395 Tapscott Road	Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B…	12 November 2015 – 17 February 2016	1

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 13 March 2021Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0027/21SCClosed · Approved
Submitted 9 October 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0252/19SCClosed · Approved
Submitted 16 August 2019Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0032/19SCClosed · Approved
Submitted 19 July 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 192120 ESC 23 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 27 February 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0059/19SCClosed · Approved
Submitted 21 January 2019Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0006/19SCClosed · Approved
Submitted 26 January 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 110406 ESC 42 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 22 December 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0503/17SCClosed · Approved
Submitted 27 March 2017Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0012/17SCApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn

Data table· 9 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
B0027/21SC Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	13 March 2021	Closed Approved
A0252/19SC Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	9 October 2019	Closed Approved
B0032/19SC Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	16 August 2019	Closed Approved
19 192120 ESC 23 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	19 July 2019	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0059/19SC Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	27 February 2019	Closed Approved
B0006/19SC Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	21 January 2019	Closed Approved
18 110406 ESC 42 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	26 January 2018	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0503/17SC Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	22 December 2017	Closed Approved
B0012/17SC Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	27 March 2017	Application Withdrawn Withdrawn

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 23

4 lobbied · 13 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 4 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 23: 4 lobbied and 13 matched unlobbied applications in 3 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	13	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 23

3 lobbied · 32 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 23: 3 lobbied and 32 matched unlobbied applications in 3 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	3	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	32	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 23

2 lobbied · 2 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 23: 2 lobbied and 2 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.