Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
137 Dunvegan Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.69427, -79.40769
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Matlow | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 22 March 2018 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM25788 | Edward Rogers | 137 Dunvegan Road | Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 8 March 2018 – 8 March 2019 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 13 May 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0544/17TEYClosed · Approved
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0544/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 May 2017 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
137 Dunvegan Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0544/17TEY · submitted 13 May 2017 · Closed · from registration SM25788 (Edward Rogers)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25788: 137 Dunvegan Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0544/17TEY at 137 Dunvegan Rd: To construct a new three-storey detached dwelling with a rear integral three-car garage with a second floor terrace above. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 137 Dunvegan Road
Matched fields
- address
- 137 DUNVEGAN RD
- application_address
- 137 DUNVEGAN RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 12
20 lobbied · 357 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 106 | 50% (n=12) | 50% | 35% | 86% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 357 | 145 | 90% (n=291) | 10% | 5% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.