Address · Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
135 Fenelon Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
- Location
- 43.76283, -79.33795
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 8 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 34 Don Valley East | Member of council | 6 | 2 | 2 November 2017 |
| Economic Development & Culture | City staff | 3 | 3 | 20 March 2026 |
| Jon Burnside | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 10 February 2026 |
| Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 2 November 2017 |
| Jon Burnside | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 16 March 2026 |
| FIFA World Cup 2026 Secretariat | City staff | 1 | 0 | 10 February 2026 |
| Toronto Buildling | City staff | 1 | 0 | 10 February 2026 |
| Denzil Minnan-Wong's Office | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 10 June 2016 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM37972 | Cristian Dzeko | 135 Fenelon Drive. | Signs | 1 October 2026 – 1 October 2027 | 0 |
| SM36969 | Cristian Dzeko | 135 Fenelon Drive. | Signs | 19 September 2025 – 18 September 2026 | 10 |
| SM25213 | Beaux Properties International Inc. | 135 Fenelon Drive | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 24 October 2017 – 23 March 2018 | 2 |
| SM23240 | Beaux Properties International Inc. | 135 Fenelon Drive | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 10 June 2016 – 31 March 2019 | 7 |
| SM14170 | Beaux Properties International Inc. | 135 Fenelon Drive. | Signs | 2 March 2010 – 6 April 2010 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 22 December 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 270142 NNY 34 OZOMB Appeal · In progress
- Submitted 6 September 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 269069 NNY 34 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 270142 NNY 34 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 December 2016 | OMB Appeal In progress |
| 11 269069 NNY 34 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 6 September 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
135 Fenelon Dr · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 270142 NNY 34 OZ · submitted 22 December 2016 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM23240 (Beaux Properties International Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23240: Discuss proposed re-development of property at 135 Fenelon Drive; (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 270142 NNY 34 OZ at 135 Fenelon Dr: This is an application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit two infill mid-rise apartment buildings that are 6 and 8 storeys in height. The 6 storey residential building (north building) would consist of 123 rental units with a gross floor area of 8,362 square metres. The 8 storey mixed-use buildin… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Discuss proposed re-development of property at 135 Fenelon Drive;
Matched fields
- address
- 135 FENELON DR
- application_address
- 135 FENELON DR
135 Fenelon Dr · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 270142 NNY 34 OZ · submitted 22 December 2016 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM25213 (Beaux Properties International Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25213: Supporting the development of 135 Fenelon Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 270142 NNY 34 OZ at 135 Fenelon Dr: This is an application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit two infill mid-rise apartment buildings that are 6 and 8 storeys in height. The 6 storey residential building (north building) would consist of 123 rental units with a gross floor area of 8,362 square metres. The 8 storey mixed-use buildin… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Supporting the development of 135 Fenelon Drive
Matched fields
- address
- 135 FENELON DR
- application_address
- 135 FENELON DR
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16
4 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16
10 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.