Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
134 Peter St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64862, -79.39357
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
7These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 6 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 28 | 7 | 13 December 2018 |
| Office of the Mayor | Councillor staff | 6 | 1 | 27 August 2019 |
| Economic Development & Culture | City staff | 5 | 1 | 26 June 2017 |
| Economic Development and Culture | City staff | 3 | 1 | 16 June 2017 |
| Mayor | Member of council | 3 | 2 | 5 August 2016 |
| Economic Development | City staff | 2 | 2 | 4 August 2016 |
All registrations· 7 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM28070 | Entertainment One Canada Ltd. | 134 Peter St. | Economic Development; Signs | 1 April 2019 – 24 December 2020 | 0 |
| SM26197 | ENTERTAINMENT ONE LTD | 134 Peter St. | Economic Development; Signs | 11 May 2018 – 31 March 2019 | 1 |
| SM25953 | ENTERTAINMENT ONE LTD | 134 Peter Street | Arts / Culture; Attractions / Tourism; Signs | 29 March 2018 – 28 March 2020 | 12 |
| SM23188 | ENTERTAINMENT ONE LTD | 134 Peter Street | Arts / Culture; Attractions / Tourism; Signs | 31 May 2016 – 31 May 2018 | 29 |
| SM21527 | ENTERTAINMENT ONE LTD | 134 Peter St | Economic Development; Signs | 20 March 2015 – 10 March 2016 | 0 |
| SM21501 | ENTERTAINMENT ONE LTD | 134 Peter St | Economic Development; Signs | 4 March 2015 – 8 February 2017 | 5 |
| SM12248 | Allied Properties REIT | 134 Peter Street | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 11 September 2008 – 11 September 2009 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 16 February 2010Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 10 118668 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 118668 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 16 February 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.