Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
133 John St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64876, -79.39032
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Cressy | Councillor staff | 5 | 3 | 8 December 2020 |
| Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York | Member of council | 3 | 0 | 28 June 2022 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM30851 | Deltera Inc. | 133 John Street | Planning and Development; Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Developme… | 11 November 2020 – 31 December 2026 | 8 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 6 November 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 235019 STE 10 CDUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 16 June 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 171253 STE 10 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
- Submitted 16 June 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 171254 STE 10 SAUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 235019 STE 10 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 6 November 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 171253 STE 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 16 June 2021 | Council Approved Approved |
| 21 171254 STE 10 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 16 June 2021 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
241 Richmond St W · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
21 235019 STE 10 CD · submitted 6 November 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM27361 (Festival Hall Developments Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27361: Assisting with the development application at 126, 132, 142 John St. & 259, 261, 263 & 267 Richmond St. W. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 235019 STE 10 CD at 241 Richmond St W: *** Draft Plan of Condominium for 470 units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development application at 126, 132, 142 John St. & 259, 261, 263 & 267 Richmond St. W.
Matched fields
- address
- 142 JOHN ST
- application_address
- 133 JOHN ST
241 Richmond St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 171253 STE 10 OZ · submitted 16 June 2021 · Council Approved · from registration SM30851 (Deltera Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30851: 241 Richmond Street West and 133 John Street application for rezoning and site plan (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 171253 STE 10 OZ at 241 Richmond St W: Proposed Zoning By-law amendment re-submission to allow the redevelopment of the site with a 40-storey mixed-use building with a total height of 132.5 metres. The application proposes commercial uses within the ground floor and 459 residential units above. The existing heritage buildings at 241 Ric… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 241 Richmond Street West and 133 John Street application for rezoning and site plan
Matched fields
- address
- 241 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 241 RICHMOND ST W
241 Richmond St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 171254 STE 10 SA · submitted 16 June 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM30851 (Deltera Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30851: 241 Richmond Street West and 133 John Street application for rezoning and site plan (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 171254 STE 10 SA at 241 Richmond St W: Site Plan application to support the Council approved redevelopment of the site with a 41-storey mixed-use building with a total height of 132.5 metres. The application includes commercial uses within the ground floor and 479 residential units above. The existing heritage buildings at 241 Richmond … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 241 Richmond Street West and 133 John Street application for rezoning and site plan
Matched fields
- address
- 241 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 241 RICHMOND ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.