Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
1293 Bloor St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.65816, -79.44305
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandra Bravo | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 27 March 2023 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM34144 | RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust | 1293 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 7 February 2023 – 31 December 2024 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 9 August 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 188061 STE 09 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 9 August 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 188062 STE 09 OZUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 188061 STE 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 9 August 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| 22 188062 STE 09 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 9 August 2022 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1293 Bloor St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 188061 STE 09 SA · submitted 9 August 2022 · Under Review · from registration SM34144 (RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34144: 1293 Bloor Street West - Application for combined Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Bylaw Amendment, and Site Plan Approval; including Rental Housing Demolition or Conversion application. Proposal for a mixed-use tower. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 188061 STE 09 SA at 1293 Bloor St W: The Site is proposed to be redeveloped with a new 28-storey (plus mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building. A total gross floor area of 18,392 square metres is proposed, consisting of 18,145 square metres of residential uses and 247 square metres of grade-related retail uses. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1293 Bloor Street West - Application for combined Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Bylaw Amendment, and Site Plan Approval; including Rental Ho…
Matched fields
- address
- 1293 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1293 BLOOR ST W
510 Lansdowne Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 188062 STE 09 OZ · submitted 9 August 2022 · Under Review · from registration SM34144 (RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM34144: 1293 Bloor Street West - Application for combined Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Bylaw Amendment, and Site Plan Approval; including Rental Housing Demolition or Conversion application. Proposal for a mixed-use tower. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 188062 STE 09 OZ at 510 Lansdowne Ave: The Site is proposed to be redeveloped with a new 28-storey (plus mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building. A total gross floor area of 18,392 square metres is proposed, consisting of 18,145 square metres of residential uses and 247 square metres of grade-related retail uses. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1293 Bloor Street West - Application for combined Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Bylaw Amendment, and Site Plan Approval; including Rental Ho…
Matched fields
- address
- 1293 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1293 BLOOR ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9
19 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.