Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow

128 Davisville Ave

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 0
Communications on those registrations: 0
Applications at this address: 7; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Location: 43.69957, -79.39154
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

None.

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

No communications recorded.

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 22 August 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0817/18TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 22 August 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0818/18TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 22 August 2018Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0083/18TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 14 March 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0279/18TEYClosed · Withdrawn
Submitted 14 March 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0280/18TEYClosed · Withdrawn
Submitted 14 March 2018Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0030/18TEYClosed · Withdrawn
Submitted 19 December 2017Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0130/17TEYClosed · Withdrawn

Data table· 7 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0817/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	22 August 2018	Closed Approved
A0818/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	22 August 2018	Closed Approved
B0083/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	22 August 2018	Closed Approved
A0279/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	14 March 2018	Closed Withdrawn
A0280/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	14 March 2018	Closed Withdrawn
B0030/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	14 March 2018	Closed Withdrawn
B0130/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	19 December 2017	Closed Withdrawn

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 12

20 lobbied · 357 matched

Median days

Lobbied106
Matched, unlobbied145

Approval rate

Lobbied50% n=12
Matched, unlobbied90% n=291

Refusal rate

Lobbied50%
Matched, unlobbied10%

Appeal rate

Lobbied35%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Objection rate

Lobbied86%
Matched, unlobbied30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 12: 20 lobbied and 357 matched unlobbied applications in 7 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	20	106	50% (n=12)	50%	35%	86%
Matched, unlobbied	357	145	90% (n=291)	10%	5%	30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 2 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.