1272 Dundas St W

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 2; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 4; 1 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 1; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
Location: 43.64970, -79.42501
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Toronto Mahjong Society Inc.SM29077 · 28 October 20194
Toronto Mahjong Society Inc.SM29133 · 1 November 20190

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Office of Councillor Bailao, Ward 94

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Office of Councillor Bailao, Ward 9	Councillor staff	4	3	8 November 2019

All registrations· 2 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM29133	Toronto Mahjong Society Inc.	1272 Dundas St West	Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance	1 November 2019 – 31 December 2019	0
SM29077	Toronto Mahjong Society Inc.	1272 Dundas St West	By-law / Regulation; Licences / Licensing	28 October 2019 – 31 December 2019	4

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 23 April 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0424/19TEYClosed · Approved

Data table· 1 row

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0424/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	23 April 2019	Closed Approved

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

1272 Dundas St W · Minor variance (MV)
A0424/19TEY · submitted 23 April 2019 · Closed · from registration SM29133 (Toronto Mahjong Society Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM29133: Zoning variance & Committee of Adjustments hearing for 1272 Dundas St West/Bar Mordecai (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0424/19TEY at 1272 Dundas St W: To alter the existing three-storey mixed use building by converting the basement and first storey from an office use to restaurant use. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning variance & Committee of Adjustments hearing for 1272 Dundas St West/Bar Mordecai
Matched fields
address
1272 DUNDAS ST W
application_address
1272 DUNDAS ST W

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 9

27 lobbied · 333 matched

Median days

Lobbied169
Matched, unlobbied134

Approval rate

Lobbied67% n=27
Matched, unlobbied95% n=279

Refusal rate

Lobbied33%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Appeal rate

Lobbied26%
Matched, unlobbied6%

Objection rate

Lobbied29%
Matched, unlobbied30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 9: 27 lobbied and 333 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	27	169	67% (n=27)	33%	26%	29%
Matched, unlobbied	333	134	95% (n=279)	5%	6%	30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.