Address · Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
1221 Markham Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
- Location
- 43.77875, -79.23175
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
8These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor De Baeremaeker | Councillor staff | 4 | 0 | 1 February 2018 |
| Ward 38 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 29 January 2018 |
All registrations· 8 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM31075 | Vermilion Group Inc. | 1221 Markham Road | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 8 January 2021 – 31 December 2021 | 0 |
| SM31080 | Vermilion Developments | 1221 Markham Road | Planning and Development; Combined Application | 7 January 2021 – 7 January 2022 | 0 |
| SM25635 | Wellesley St Nicholas Residences GP Inc. | 1221 Markham Road. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 8 February 2018 – 8 December 2018 | 0 |
| SM25579 | Fitzrovia Capital Incorporated | 1221 Markham Road. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 25 January 2018 – 23 March 2018 | 5 |
| SM11559 | Kingsberg Monetary Corporation | 1221 Markham Road | Planning Act Application - Zoning Amendment | 16 April 2008 | 0 |
| SM11230 | Kingsberg Monetary Corporation | 1221 Markham Road | Planning Act Application - Zoning Amendment | 26 February 2008 – 4 October 2011 | 0 |
| SM11106 | Kingsberg Monetary Corporation | 1221 Markham Road | Planning Act Application - Zoning Amendment | 19 February 2008 – 19 July 2011 | 0 |
| SM11117 | Kingsberg Monetary Corporation | 1221 Markham Road | Planning Act Application - Zoning Amendment | 19 February 2008 – 16 September 2011 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 18 June 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5861469Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 21 October 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0347/21SCOMB Appeal · Refused
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| COA-5861469 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 18 June 2026 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| A0347/21SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 21 October 2021 | OMB Appeal Refused |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1221 Markham Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0347/21SC · submitted 21 October 2021 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM31075 (Vermilion Group Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31075: Vermilion Group is developing a high-rise project on 1221 Markham Road, the development is comprised with 3 towers, Site Plan Application was submitted in 2020. We're looking forward to building dynamic street view to Woburn neighbourhood。 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0347/21SC at 1221 Markham Rd: To construct a mixed-use development consisting of three residential towers having heights of 21, 27 and 30 storeys, containing 879 dwelling units in total. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Vermilion Group is developing a high-rise project on 1221 Markham Road, the development is comprised with 3 towers, Site Plan Application was submitted in 2020. We're looking forward to buil…
Matched fields
- address
- 1221 MARKHAM RD
- application_address
- 1221 MARKHAM RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 24
3 lobbied · 13 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.