Address · Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
120 Donlands Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
- Location
- 43.68424, -79.33917
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 118 DONLANDS AVE (2 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 29 Toronto-Danforth | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 15 December 2014 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM19172 | Louisville Homes LTD | 120 Donlands Ave | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan | 5 April 2013 – 30 December 2015 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 15 April 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 140951 STE 14 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 11 June 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 186029 STE 29 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 31 December 2012Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 12 298596 STE 29 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 31 December 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 298600 STE 29 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 140951 STE 14 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 15 April 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 186029 STE 29 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 11 June 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 298596 STE 29 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 31 December 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 298600 STE 29 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 31 December 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
120 Donlands Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 298600 STE 29 OZ · submitted 31 December 2012 · Closed · from registration SM19172 (Louisville Homes LTD)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19172: zonning Policies of the city Re (120 Donlands Ave ) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 298600 STE 29 OZ at 120 Donlands Ave: Louisville Homes Ltd. proposes to construct a four-storey apartment building comprising fourtownhouses and 15 apartment units along with 14 car parking spaces and 16 bicyclespaces. The property is proposed to be rezoned from R2A to R2A.44. Louisville haspresented to the Ontario Municipal Board (Boa… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: zonning Policies of the city Re (120 Donlands Ave )
Matched fields
- address
- 120 DONLANDS AVE
- application_address
- 120 DONLANDS AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 14
18 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 14
17 lobbied · 35 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 35 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.