Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
12 Ossington Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64446, -79.41938
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Cressy, Ward 10 | Councillor staff | 14 | 0 | 8 December 2020 |
| Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 18 January 2019 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM25712 | Hullmark Developments Limited | 12 Ossington Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian… | 21 March 2018 – 31 March 2026 | 12 |
| SM22225 | Hullmark Developments Limited | 12 Ossington Avenue. | Planning and Development, Heritage; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning a… | 15 September 2015 – 31 March 2021 | 4 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 26 April 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 149402 STE 19 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 March 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0298/18TEYClosed · Approved
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 149402 STE 19 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 26 April 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0298/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 20 March 2018 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
12 Ossington Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 149402 STE 19 SA · submitted 26 April 2018 · Closed · from registration SM25712 (Hullmark Developments Limited)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM25712: 12 Ossington Avenue Minor Variance to permit the construction of a new 4 storey non-residential building Site Plan to permit the construction of a new 4 storey non-residential building (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 149402 STE 19 SA at 12 Ossington Ave: Site Plan Control application to permit the construction of a new 4-storey office/retail building (1653.0 sq. m.) (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 12 Ossington Avenue Minor Variance to permit the construction of a new 4 storey non-residential building Site Plan to permit the constructi…
Matched fields
- address
- 12 OSSINGTON AVE
- application_address
- 12 OSSINGTON AVE
12 Ossington Ave · Minor variance (MV)
A0298/18TEY · submitted 20 March 2018 · Closed · from registration SM25712 (Hullmark Developments Limited)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM25712: 12 Ossington Avenue Minor Variance to permit the construction of a new 4 storey non-residential building Site Plan to permit the construction of a new 4 storey non-residential building (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0298/18TEY at 12 Ossington Ave: To permit the construction of a new four-storey commercial building (Retail and Office Uses). Note: Concurrent Site Plan Application 2018 149402 STE 19 SA. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 12 Ossington Avenue Minor Variance to permit the construction of a new 4 storey non-residential building Site Plan to permit the constructi…
Matched fields
- address
- 12 OSSINGTON AVE
- application_address
- 12 OSSINGTON AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10
20 lobbied · 261 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 136 | 100% (n=20) | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 261 | 138 | 93% (n=214) | 7% | 5% | 18% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.