Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik

12 Bonnycastle St

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 6; 2 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 9; 2 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Location: 43.64588, -79.36475
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Great Gulf Group of CompaniesSM19253 · 1 May 20136

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale4
Office of Councillor McConnell2

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	4	4	23 September 2015
Office of Councillor McConnell	Councillor staff	2	2	23 September 2015

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM19253	Great Gulf Group of Companies	12 Bonnycastle Street	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Minor Va…	1 May 2013 – 7 June 2019	6

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 4 July 2019Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 19 183020 STE 10 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 27 June 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0723/19TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 23 April 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0425/19TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 23 April 2019Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0035/19TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 20 December 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1201/18TEYClosed · Withdrawn
Submitted 1 October 2018Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0089/18TEYClosed · Withdrawn
Submitted 7 December 2017Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 17 272945 STE 28 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 18 October 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 294755 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 6 October 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 288589 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 9 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
19 183020 STE 10 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	4 July 2019	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0723/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	27 June 2019	Closed Approved
A0425/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	23 April 2019	Closed Approved
B0035/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	23 April 2019	Closed Approved
A1201/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	20 December 2018	Closed Withdrawn
B0089/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	1 October 2018	Closed Withdrawn
17 272945 STE 28 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	7 December 2017	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
11 294755 STE 28 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	18 October 2011	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
11 288589 STE 28 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	6 October 2011	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

12 Bonnycastle St · Minor variance (MV)
A0723/19TEY · submitted 27 June 2019 · Closed · from registration SM19253 (Great Gulf Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19253: 12 Bonnycastle Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0723/19TEY at 12 Bonnycastle St: To reduce the required number of residential visitor parking spaces for the residential condominium contained within the 44-storey mixed-use building. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 12 Bonnycastle Street
Matched fields
address
12 BONNYCASTLE ST
application_address
12 BONNYCASTLE ST
12 Bonnycastle St · Minor variance (MV)
A0425/19TEY · submitted 23 April 2019 · Closed · from registration SM19253 (Great Gulf Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19253: 12 Bonnycastle Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0425/19TEY at 12 Bonnycastle St: To establish an underground commercial parking garage on the conveyed lands, as described in application B0035/19TEY. The parking garage will have 44 paid parking spaces for the residential and retail visitors to the 44-storey mixed-use building. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 12 Bonnycastle Street
Matched fields
address
12 BONNYCASTLE ST
application_address
12 BONNYCASTLE ST

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10

4 lobbied · 25 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10: 4 lobbied and 25 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	25	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10

20 lobbied · 261 matched

Median days

Lobbied136
Matched, unlobbied138

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=20
Matched, unlobbied93% n=214

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Objection rate

Lobbied14%
Matched, unlobbied18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10: 20 lobbied and 261 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	20	136	100% (n=20)	0%	0%	14%
Matched, unlobbied	261	138	93% (n=214)	7%	5%	18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 2 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied10%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	88	—	100% (n=7)	0%	10%	0.03
Matched, unlobbied	94	—	100% (n=7)	0%	5%	0.01

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	66	—	100% (n=5)	0%	3%	0.05
Matched, unlobbied	165	—	100% (n=11)	0%	2%	0.04

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

About this address

Registrations that mention this address

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Linked lobbying registrations

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Council and committee items naming this address

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

Committee of Adjustment applications

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide