Address · Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
1165 Weston Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
- Location
- 43.68744, -79.49005
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 22 January 2024Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 24 106895 WET 05 SAOMB Appeal · In progress
- Submitted 22 January 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 106901 WET 05 OZOMB Appeal · In progress
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 106895 WET 05 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 22 January 2024 | OMB Appeal In progress |
| 24 106901 WET 05 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 January 2024 | OMB Appeal In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1179 Weston Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
24 106895 WET 05 SA · submitted 22 January 2024 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM34393 (8-16 Locust Street LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34393: 8 – 16 Locust Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 106895 WET 05 SA at 1179 Weston Rd: Construct a 38 storey mixed-use building with retail at grade, residential above, and one level of underground parking. 382 units, approx gross floor area 22,576m2. Associated with 17 Locust Street, 48 storey residential building. The first of the two development sites is located at the southeast c… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 8 – 16 Locust Street
Matched fields
- address
- 16 LOCUST ST
- application_address
- 17 LOCUST ST
1179 Weston Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
24 106895 WET 05 SA · submitted 22 January 2024 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM35723 (8-16 Locust Street LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35723: 8-16 Locust Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 106895 WET 05 SA at 1179 Weston Rd: Construct a 38 storey mixed-use building with retail at grade, residential above, and one level of underground parking. 382 units, approx gross floor area 22,576m2. Associated with 17 Locust Street, 48 storey residential building. The first of the two development sites is located at the southeast c… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 8-16 Locust Street
Matched fields
- address
- 8-16 LOCUST ST
- application_address
- 7 LOCUST ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 5
15 lobbied · 40 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 40 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5
12 lobbied · 17 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.