Address · Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
1151 Markham Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
- Location
- 43.77614, -79.23122
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 15 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate Real Estate Management | City staff | 13 | 0 | 13 October 2020 |
| Ward 24 Scarborough-Guildwood | Member of council | 7 | 0 | 20 June 2022 |
| Parks, Forestry and Recreation | City staff | 4 | 0 | 2 November 2020 |
| CreateTO | Local board | 4 | 0 | 14 May 2020 |
| Corporate Services | City staff | 3 | 0 | 9 September 2020 |
| Councillor Paul Ainslie's office | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 31 October 2020 |
| City Planning | City staff | 2 | 0 | 2 November 2020 |
| Legal Services | City staff | 2 | 0 | 17 August 2020 |
| Paul Ainslie | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 1 October 2024 |
| Infrastructure and Development Services | City staff | 1 | 0 | 9 September 2020 |
| Legal - Planning & Administrative Tribunal Law | City staff | 1 | 0 | 20 June 2025 |
| Councillor Pasternak | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 15 July 2022 |
| Councillor Paul Ainslie | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 15 June 2022 |
| Mayor | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 14 August 2020 |
| Ward 6 York Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 15 July 2022 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM33378 | Larry Blankenstein | 1151 Markham Road | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 20 June 2022 – 31 August 2023 | 1 |
| SM29962 | Lash Group of Companies | 1151 Markham Road | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application; Real Estate / Property (City-owned) | 13 April 2020 – 31 December 2026 | 45 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 27 April 2026Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 26 150819 ESC 24 OZUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 4 April 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 130490 ESC 24 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 4 April 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 130491 ESC 24 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
- Submitted 6 June 2012Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 12 187411 ESC 38 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 150819 ESC 24 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 27 April 2026 | Under Review In progress |
| 22 130490 ESC 24 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 4 April 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| 22 130491 ESC 24 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 4 April 2022 | Council Approved Approved |
| 12 187411 ESC 38 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 6 June 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1151 Markham Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 130490 ESC 24 SA · submitted 4 April 2022 · Under Review · from registration SM33378 (Larry Blankenstein)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33378: 1151 Markham Road, 1 and 2 Meadowglen Place (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 130490 ESC 24 SA at 1151 Markham Rd: Site Plan application for a 44-storey building comprised of 440 residential dwelling units and 223 square meters of retail gross floor area. There will also be on-site parkland dedicated along the easterly boundary of the subject site. The proposal includes 149 car parking spaces, 367 bicycle parki… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1151 Markham Road, 1 and 2 Meadowglen Place
Matched fields
- address
- 1151 MARKHAM RD
- application_address
- 1151 MARKHAM RD
1151 Markham Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 130491 ESC 24 OZ · submitted 4 April 2022 · Council Approved · from registration SM33378 (Larry Blankenstein)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33378: 1151 Markham Road, 1 and 2 Meadowglen Place (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 130491 ESC 24 OZ at 1151 Markham Rd: Rezoning for a 44-storey building comprised of 455 residential dwelling units and 310 square meters of retail gross floor area. The proposal includes 106 car parking spaces, 342 bicycle parking spaces and one Type G and one Type C loading spaces. The development will result in a density of approxim… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1151 Markham Road, 1 and 2 Meadowglen Place
Matched fields
- address
- 1151 MARKHAM RD
- application_address
- 1151 MARKHAM RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 24
8 lobbied · 7 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 24
6 lobbied · 15 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.