Address · Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
1129-1145 Huntingwood Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
- Location
- 43.79704, -79.28234
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 1129 HUNTINGWOOD DR.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 21 February 2018Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4325602Cancelled · Withdrawn
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| COA-4325602 Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 21 February 2018 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1129-1145 Huntingwood Dr · Consent (severance) (CO)
COA-4325602 · submitted 21 February 2018 · Cancelled · from registration SM26494 (Archizoning Design Inc)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26494: to appeal the COA notice of decision on the 1129 Huntingwood Dr, Scarborough, ON. A0060/18SC A0058/18SC B0009/18SC (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application COA-4325602 at 1129-1145 Huntingwood Dr: (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: to appeal the COA notice of decision on the 1129 Huntingwood Dr, Scarborough, ON. A0060/18SC A0058/18SC B0009/18SC
Matched fields
- address
- 1129 HUNTINGWOOD DR
- application_address
- 1129-1145 HUNTINGWOOD DR
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 23
4 lobbied · 13 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.