Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe

1109 Bathurst St

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 3; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 6; 2 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 2; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Location: 43.67371, -79.41420
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Talus Capital Corp.SM31385 · 25 February 20216
Talus Capital Corp.SM34959 · 26 October 20230
Talus Capital Corp.SM29845 · 4 March 20200

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Office of Coucillor Layton, Ward 114
Ward 11 University-Rosedale2

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Office of Coucillor Layton, Ward 11	Councillor staff	4	0	4 March 2021
Ward 11 University-Rosedale	Member of council	2	0	4 March 2021

All registrations· 3 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM34959	Talus Capital Corp.	1109 Bathurst Street	Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Consent to S…	26 October 2023 – 31 December 2023	0
SM31385	Talus Capital Corp.	1109 Bathurst Street	Planning and Development; Combined Application	25 February 2021 – 18 August 2021	6
SM29845	Talus Capital Corp.	1109 Bathurst Street	Planning and Development; Planning and Development, Combined Application	4 March 2020 – 1 December 2020	0

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 24 June 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 159922 STE 11 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 24 June 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 159926 STE 11 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 2 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
20 159922 STE 11 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	24 June 2020	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
20 159926 STE 11 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	24 June 2020	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11

69 lobbied · 60 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=10
Matched, unlobbied100% n=4

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied10%
Matched, unlobbied11%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11: 69 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 31 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	69	—	100% (n=10)	0%	10%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	60	—	100% (n=4)	0%	11%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11

46 lobbied · 113 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied9%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11: 46 lobbied and 113 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	46	—	100% (n=3)	0%	9%	0.09
Matched, unlobbied	113	—	100% (n=11)	0%	2%	0.02

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.